Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Chris Hubbs's avatar

This is wonderful, Crisanne. As I was really deconstructing my evangelicalism I held onto the thought, much less concisely stated than you did here, that Jesus' words and examples must actually mean things. If Jesus uses a metaphor of God as a good father, then God's parental love and fatherly characteristics must be meaningfully aligned with the parental love and instincts that I as a father have for my own children. Obviously God's are better; but they must at least be the same _kind_ of thing.

The move that I saw my evangelical church making was to say that 'sure, God is love, but God's love is so unlike our love that it doesn't look like what we think love looks like'. And I finally came to reject that move. (I also then paired that with reading Thomas Talbott and ended up a Christian universalist... but that's another story.)

So yes: the love of God is real, and we don't have to imagine it or force it in somehow. It will feel like love, real, in-person love. Amen and hallelujah.

Expand full comment
Post '22 | Michele Arndt's avatar

Such a clarifying thought, Crisanne! I also appreciate that you said so much in so little space. I sometimes feel like the Substack space is for those who can write scholarly journal level stuff. Your piece here modeled the goodness of richness without needing to write pages!

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts